The presidential debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump was held Tuesday night in Philadelphia, PA. During this discussion, topics like immigration, the economy, abortion, and other issues of consequence were discussed.
About an hour and a half into the debate, the candidates discussed the danger of global warming. I say "danger" loosely because it’s not really as big of an issue as the left would have us believe. But nonetheless, they talked about it.
Read: Jemele Hill Says More Blacks Will Be Abused By Cops If Trump Is Elected
Evidently, the time devoted to this topic was unacceptable to ESPN‘s Mina Kimes. She claims that it’s one of our world's most important issues.
In 20 years, history will not look kindly at the fact that it took 1.5 hours of a debate to (briefly) get to climate change.
— Mina Kimes (@minakimes) September 11, 2024
While many still rightfully question whether "man-made global warming" is one of the biggest hoaxes in history, let’s briefly assume that it deserves to be treated as a big issue.
Does talking about it at a presidential debate for a longer period of time than what happened at the debates do anything to move the needle in either direction? It's been talked about for years, from the media focusing on the "coming ice age" of the 1970's to former vice-president Al Gore claiming the planet would hit an irreversible “point of no return” by 2016.
Some thoughts that people have need not be shared on the Internet. Kimes' tweet was one of them.
Follow MRCTV on X!
REPORT: Police Call Suggests Haitians Are Indeed Killing Local Geese in Ohiohttps://t.co/ZZna5XIHlQ
— MRCTV (@mrctv) September 11, 2024