Ah, the New York Times. The only things that rag is good for is for rich liberals to be able to say, ‘Look, they said it in the Times!’, as liner for bird crap in cages and for being communist dictators’ favorite “news” outlet of choice. I wouldn’t wrap a gift with the New York Times out of fear it might steal and change the contents of the gift.
Basically, if I were really down on my luck, I wouldn’t even use it as toilet paper.
Why am I so venomous against the NYT today? Because here we go again with the Russian propaganda. These hacks masquerading as “journalists” really don’t get why the overwhelming majority of people not only don’t trust them anymore but dislike them with the heat of 1,000 Suns.
NYT’s chief White House correspondent is upset that President Donald Trump’s administration is varying up the White House press pool on a daily basis to such a degree that propagandist Peter Baker is likening it to “the early days of President Vladimir V. Putin’s reign in Russia.”
That’s not a joke. You didn’t time travel back to 2016.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a recent briefing that “All journalists, outlets and voices deserve a seat at this highly coveted table. So, by deciding which outlets make up the limited press pool on a day-to-day basis, the White House will be restoring power back to the American people.”
The establishment propaganda outlets are NOT being shut out, but they’re making it seem that way because they might be replaced on certain days with other outlets in order to give them a chance. So Reuters and the Associated Press (AP) will have to take a back seat to reputable reporting every now and then. Big deal. It's not like the CEO of Thomson Reuters, who is also on the board of Pfizer, has or had a conflict of interest, particularly during a pandemic, right?
Related: PBS, Stelter, NYT Agree About Trump’s Kremlin-Style ‘Chilling Effect’ on AP
So apparently, it’s “Soviet” to allow more press to cover the White House instead of simply catering to the same 10 outlets that have been bought and paid for in previous decades and administrations.
“All of this is taking place against the backdrop of a major shift in foreign policy as Mr. Trump pivots away from Ukraine and toward Mr. Putin’s Russia,” Baker wrote.
All Baker had to do was wait a single day, and he would’ve learned about the deal the Trump administration made with Ukraine where the U.S. gets access to minerals in their country, and they get to fight another day without going completely broke.
But no, Baker and the swamp creatures like him want Trump to be a Russian asset so bad that they’ll jump to any extreme just to make the comparison.
In reality, the New York Times has been a safe haven for communism going back around 100 years. If he were still alive, all you’d have to do is just ask Walter Duranty. Look him up. I’m not your dad.
Do they still think this crap still works, if it ever did? It would be hilarious if they weren’t such sad, small tongue chewers.
The New…York…Times. What is it good for? Absolutely nothing.
Follow Us On X
Chuck Schumer attacks Elon Musk claiming he has no idea what he’s doing with DOGE. https://t.co/FXbOX1w67b
— MRCTV (@mrctv) February 27, 2025